| Silvia Club of NSW https://forum.silviansw.com/ |
|
| SilviaNSW Dyno Night - Sat 12th April 2008 https://forum.silviansw.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=29694 |
Page 31 of 35 |
| Author: | Timo [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 2:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
thanks for organising this guys. it was a good night. it was good to see all my mods come together and give me the power i was looking for. i nearly guessed it. i thought i should get 175kw, 180kw would of been good. i got 178kw. |
|
| Author: | Anabolic [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 3:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
reaper wrote: Anabolic wrote: What was the big argument over power figures? the fact u cheated by running more boost than me!  (I dont actually have any idea what the argument was about nor did I know there was an argument) Ok so it's MY problem... that YOU don't have a boost controller.... 
Seriously though, yours looks a lot more exciting to drive than mine. |
|
| Author: | radism [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 3:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Anabolic wrote: reaper wrote: Anabolic wrote: What was the big argument over power figures? the fact u cheated by running more boost than me! (I dont actually have any idea what the argument was about nor did I know there was an argument) Ok so it's MY problem... that YOU don't have a boost controller.... Seriously though, yours looks a lot more exciting to drive than mine. testify to that |
|
| Author: | SamBo [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 3:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Seemed the 170 - 180rwkw bracket was pretty popular! I was hoping for at least 160rwkw and got 164 so I was pretty happy. Was a top night, thanks again for organising it guys
|
|
| Author: | reaper [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 4:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
yeah its fun but I cant do 8000 rpm clutch dumps without spinning the wheels like you can 
|
|
| Author: | DHC [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 6:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Was a fun night, havent been to a dyno day for ages. Very suprised with the stock power figure as well, I was expecting 150 MAX hahaha.. |
|
| Author: | fergo308 [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 10:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
It had nothing to do with either of you. the 'discussion' was about the relative driveability of two 180's that had over 300kw atw. Justin... reaper wrote: Anabolic wrote: What was the big argument over power figures? the fact u cheated by running more boost than me! (I dont actually have any idea what the argument was about nor did I know there was an argument) |
|
| Author: | too_much_boost [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 10:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
fergo308 wrote: It had nothing to do with either of you. the 'discussion' was about the relative driveability of two 180's that had over 300kw atw.
Justin... Actually fergo, one of those 180's never made over 200rwkw You know who you are under-200rwkw-guy! |
|
| Author: | Zac [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 10:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
fergo308 wrote: It had nothing to do with either of you. the 'discussion' was about the relative driveability of two 180's that had over 300kw atw.
Justin... A shitload of fun is the answer! found later that my plumb back bov hose had blown off leaving a hole behind the afm making it lean out on the dyno and run a bit shit 
|
|
| Author: | eddied [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 11:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
whats the go with the prelude that made 170kw, thats ALOT!! eddie |
|
| Author: | funsiz [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 11:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
$1000 dollars spend and only 6kw gained 46kw what a car and to everyone in the background when my car is on half of u where wrong and i think it was funny when they dropped and graph down to 100kw mark and a guy behind me said thats slack it should make more then that i turned around and said they need to drop it another 50 lol |
|
| Author: | chindodood [ Mon Apr 14, 2008 11:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
now i know why my reading was so low
i was thinking why do i only get 220
they got a shit readout, coz they put the probe at the tip of exhaust, where as Chea puts it at the dump pipe, takes out the o2 sensor and puts it in there and get more acurate reading, same with Paden ________ BDSM DUNGEON |
|
| Author: | Anabolic [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 12:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
chindodood wrote: now i know why my reading was so low
i was thinking why do i only get 220 they got a shit readout, coz they put the probe at the tip of exhaust, where as Chea puts it at the dump pipe, takes out the o2 sensor and puts it in there and get more acurate reading, same with Paden Mate, where you place the o2 sensor won't affect power output. Maybe you're thinking of the air temp sensor, which is usually placed somewhere near your airbox/filters. o2 sensor will only show if car is running rich or lean. |
|
| Author: | fergo308 [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 8:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Eddie: read back a page or three in the thread. the prelude was turbocharged. not that you could hear it over the exhaust... Funsiz: that little thing rocks. I've driven copens before back when I used to work for toyota. if you can squeeze yourself into one I doubt you'll get out again without a smile on your face. Chindo: I have to agree with what anabolic just said. the dyno's o2 probe has nothing to do with the output of the car during the run. putting it into the exhaust up front is done for actual tuning where you want a more accurate reading than you need on a dyno night. on the latter it's only there as a safety check. you made less power as yavuz doesn't put in high ramp rates and hang the intake temp sensor near the exhaust manifold to fudge up the numbers. what you got was an honest readout. Justin... |
|
| Author: | mokompri [ Tue Apr 15, 2008 9:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
chindodood wrote: now i know why my reading was so low
i was thinking why do i only get 220 i remember your car, big top mount turbo what turbo is it ? something that big either way needs to make more power
i also agree with the above comments regarding the 02 sensor |
|
| Page 31 of 35 | All times are UTC + 10 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|